Today in the Casey Anthony case the judge announced that the prosecution would be done with their case sometime tomorrow, that is just 17 days since the case began. This has caused a wave of panic among top news and legal analysts across the country. Many experts are concerned that the state did not prove their case and are asking many questions.
Experts are wondering why the following pieces of evidence was not presented to the jury:
1.Did Lee Anthony molest his sister Casey
2.The Gatorade bottle found near the bottle with the syringe filled with chloroform
3.The discussions about giving Caylee up for adoption to her best friend Kiomarie Cruz.
4.The cell phone pings showing what Casey was up to on June 16
5.The fact that when Casey was a kid she and her friends would bury their dead pets in the very same place Caylee was found and attach a heart shaped sticker.
6.The HUGE fight between Casey and Cindy on June 16
7.The tattoo that Casey got "The beautiful Life", after Caylee went missing/died
8.Her diary with the poem about about everyone lies and everyone dies etc.
If anyone else can think of other pieces of evidence I missed please post.
Update July 5, 2011
Casey Marie Anthony has been found not guilty of murdering her two-year-old daughter Caylee Marie Anthony; the stunning verdict was handed down on July 5 after 11 hours of deliberation. Casey Anthony was also acquitted of manslaughter and aggravated abuse of a child. She was however found guilty of providing false information to a law enforcement officer.
I am in a complete state of disbelief regarding the behavior of the media mainly on the CNN network specifically HLN. The talking heads like Nancy Grace, Vinnie Politan, BETHANY MARSHALL, CASEY JORDAN and Jane Velez Mitchell etc etc. are either completely dumb or watching a different trial because Jose Baez ripped apart every bit of evidence that the prosecution put forth. From the fake heart shaped sticker that we had been hearing about for the past three years WHICH DID NOT EXIST. Yes that is right the picture the media shoved down our throats was fake, the prosecution put that sticker there, it did not exist. The chloroform searches remember those? The 84 searches turned out to be 1 search that lasted for 3 minutes just after Casey Antony left her boyfriends MySpace page and saw the famous "Knock her out with chloroform" picture. I cannot believe how completely false and wrong and pro prosecution the commenters have been regarding this case.
The standard of proof was on the prosecution's back, from the shovel to the smell in the car the defense impeached every bit of so called evidence, we still do not know how Caylee died, how the body was transferred, the prosecution never told us these things. And NO I was not looking for a CSI moment but just because Casey Anthony acted inappropriately after her daughter's death does not make her a killer.
The search for chloroform was bogus, the media painted Casey Anthony as a liar, and a party girl but what separates the United States from the rest of the world is that you must have evidence to convict someone and not simply MOB mentality to convict someone. The prosecution did not prove their case it is plain and simple, so all you nuts who are angry and no longer have faith in our judicial system and to Nancy Grace specifically who last night on her show called the jurors on this case idiots, GO TO HELL. I am totally horrified that Nancy Grace disparaged the jurors after they put their lives on hold for 30 days and did their civil duty, listened to the evidence and set an innocent woman free.
Add your Comment
User Comments (320)
wilma said: johnny cocran had a law degree
Shelley said: Sucks doesn't it!
JJ said: I feel that Casey's verdict was a travesty of justice as much as anyone who also payed attention to the trial but there is nothing that can be done now!
So just let it go!
You may as well turn that energy towards something else positive or join the insane and talk to the wall about 'what if' for the rest of your days!!
Technokat replied to JJ : Yes--as much as anyone who paid attention to the trial. The jurors paid attention to the trial, as did many people with actual law degrees who claim that there was not enough evidence to convict Casey Anthony of murder.
Is it possible that you, JJ, can completely and utterly without reservation assign all the evidence to Casey and no one else?
If you can insert anyone else's name into all that you deem evidence, then you do not have a definitive proof that Casey and only Casey murdered her child.
I am so sick and tired of the sheep just spewing the same nonsense over and over about the trial being a "travesty of justice" and the like. The justice system is designed to keep biased torch-bearing idiots from putting innocent people to death. Too bad so many people do not understand this.
shadow said: 1 no finger prints on duct tape 2 no caylee dna on duct tape 3 no fingerprints on needle with cloraform 4 no finger prints on gatorade bottle 5 no fingerprints on inside bag with body or outside bag 6 no hair found inside trunk or dna skin samples or blood also grand mother left pool ladder down the next day from her an caylee swimming it is the duty of the prosacution to ansewer these questions one by one was caylee bones tested for dried chlorine on her bones ? why didnt the police respond too a dead body call from the meter reader ? an what about the meter reader touching evidence
, is he that stupid , zanny the nanny does exist its a childrens series of books ,juliette lewis is a actress that plays troubled womans roles so she does exist .maybe casey anthony cant tell what real an whats fantacy like the prosucution . epilog - in till a major player steps forward this is a done deal YOU PEOPLE ARE GOING TO THINK WHAT YOU WANT AND THATS A SHAME BUT NOT THE EVIDENCE REMEMBER EVRYONE DEALS WITH STRESS DIFFERANTLY
ugotmalk replied to shadow : I agree 100% with you
Technokat replied to shadow : I agree, as well, but with slightly better spelling and grammar. :-P
My biggest question is: Why didn't George call the authorities when he smelled (what he claimed he thought was) decomposition in Casey's car? Why not alert authorities right away to investigate the situation? Regardless of what his daughter said (Caylee was kidnapped, etc., etc.), his instincts as a grandfather and his training as a law enforcement officer should have trumped any "belief" in his daughter's statements, especially given the testimony that Casey was a known liar.
Did he drop the ball or did her personally ignore the smell because he knew something about the situation regarding Caylee's disappearance?
D2 said: While the crime was horrible, it would be horrible as well to put a mother inside a jail for a crime she did not commit. We should respect the judge decision, otherwise, the legal system will be ruled by emotion rather than the truth. It's time to sue the media commentator for the blemishing the life of Casey Anthony and disrespect of court.
KD replied to D2 : I agree with you
Kmiller said: Marlie, Terry, Emma, I only got through these first three posts before I had to stop and comment. Before you go on the web and criticize someone else, it might be smart to brush up on your spelling and grammar skills. Not only do your posts say you are very much uninformed, but your diction tells me that you should stop talking about a trial that you obviously did not watch, and take a course at your local community college, there are grants available. There is no excuse. Then, maybe in your spare time watch the entire trial so that you may post comments and opinions based on your own personnal knowledge and not the HLN highlights.
Technokat replied to Kmiller : The word you should have used in your last sentence is "personal," not "personnal." ::wink::
Kmiller said: Hi- I am not sure if the author of this article, "Casey Anthony Found Not guilty", has posted somewhere their name, I don't see it. Anyway, I just wanted tlo commend this Author for one of the few that I have read, to include, articles from large media sources. Its obvious from your original post, and then the updated post, that you are intellegent enough to see the truth of the matter after watching the trial and changing your view. I think the problem with the masses who disagree with the verdict is that they did not watch the entire trial. If they did, they watched with selective hearing.
Good job on your courage to say you change your mind. Its ok, its not our fault that initially we simply trusted the news. What an eye opening experience, huh? I have not lost faith in our justice system at all, I proud of the brave jurors. I HAVE, however, lost faith in journalism, and appalled at the Americans whom have allowed this fake media to think for them.
KD replied to Kmiller : You are so right about this.
marlie said: IT SEEMS LIKE SHE GOT AWAY WITH MURDER AND THERE BE NO PUNISHMENT FOR HER..BUT I HOPE THAT SHE NEVER HAVE PEACE THAT SHE ALWAYS REMEMBER THAT HER LITTLE GIRL DIED BECAUSE OF HER. AND WHEN THE TIME COME FOR HER TO BE JUDGED FOR THE ALL MIGHTY SHE FINALLY GET WHAT SHE DESERVES!!!!
ugotmalk replied to marlie : there was no evidence linking her to caylee death. so stop judging her..prove it first!!
terry said: u evidently dont have any common sence about yourself ... or u are so innorant u cant see past your noes... these heads u are talking about are speaking the truth u just dont have the brains to realize it..... what hannios crime have u been arrested for .....
emma said: The jury found her NOT GUILTY because they had to have a unanimous decision/verdict.They wanted to get home to Clearwater as soon as, if not sooner. They were not about to take the time to connect the dots of the Prosecutions case. The Ca. jury has Scott Peterson on death row with less circumstantial evidence than this case. There were at least 4 ne'er do wells on this jury but Perry would not accept the prosecution's objections.
ugotmalk replied to emma : there you go right there! no one should go to prison if they cant prove for sure they did the crime!!! the jury saw through the lie this time..thank god